Post by account_disabled on Mar 5, 2024 1:08:31 GMT -5
Indeed, scientists have theorized again and again on the question of God and faith, so that, for example, Isaac Newton, the founder of theoretical physics, stated: “ The marvelous organization and harmony of the universe can only have been realized according to the plan of an omniscient and all-powerful being. This is and will remain my ultimate and supreme knowledge . " Or the Italian Guglielmo Marconi , Nobel Prize winner to whom we owe wireless telephony and, consequently, the generation of the mobile phone: “ I proudly declare that I am a believer. I believe in the power of prayer. And not only as a believing Catholic, but also as a scientist . ” (3)
Perhaps we should go to the classical philosophers to try to know if there was Nothingness and its origin, in order to draw some conclusion, from the conviction raised because, as Fax Lists Ortega y Gasset stated, that the courtesy of the philosopher is clarity, making an extreme effort to make himself intelligible, until he believes that, because he has understood it without fatigue, he does not have to get tired to understand it completely.
Following traditional sources, the Greek philosopher Thales of Miletus maintained that there was no such thing as nothing, so one could only have anything if there was nothing to even think about anything , so when contextualizing the description of absence of something, in effect something is being described. Consequently, for Thales, Nothing can only exist if there is no one to think about it .
In Greek philosophy, the problem of defining Nothing participated in different criteria , as I have previously advanced: as a problem of the denial of being, that is, what exists is being and only when this is denied, Nothing "appears." , or as a problem of the impossibility of affirming nothingness.
Aristotle opposed the concept of empty space , stating that “ nature abhors emptiness,” as long as denial and privation occur within statements, since even non-being can be said to be.
Perhaps we should go to the classical philosophers to try to know if there was Nothingness and its origin, in order to draw some conclusion, from the conviction raised because, as Fax Lists Ortega y Gasset stated, that the courtesy of the philosopher is clarity, making an extreme effort to make himself intelligible, until he believes that, because he has understood it without fatigue, he does not have to get tired to understand it completely.
Following traditional sources, the Greek philosopher Thales of Miletus maintained that there was no such thing as nothing, so one could only have anything if there was nothing to even think about anything , so when contextualizing the description of absence of something, in effect something is being described. Consequently, for Thales, Nothing can only exist if there is no one to think about it .
In Greek philosophy, the problem of defining Nothing participated in different criteria , as I have previously advanced: as a problem of the denial of being, that is, what exists is being and only when this is denied, Nothing "appears." , or as a problem of the impossibility of affirming nothingness.
Aristotle opposed the concept of empty space , stating that “ nature abhors emptiness,” as long as denial and privation occur within statements, since even non-being can be said to be.